Posts about Business

Why you shouldn’t listen to “hasn’t someone done that already?”

Friday, June 6th, 2008

A frequent comment that entrepreneurs hear when they share product ideas is “Hasn’t someone already done that?”

It’s probably one of the most annoying comments one can hear, not because it’s not true (it is) but because it glosses over the entire history of innovation and assigns way too much credit to incumbent players. Think of it as the inverse to the mind-numbing “is y the new x killer?” worldview.

It’s a big market out there. If you think you can do something better, give it a try. Just don’t start off by wanting to kill something else. That’s not very creative. 

As a response for anyone faced with this question, I decided to create a short list (of 20, albeit somewhat from a  geek’s perspective) products that came after “someone had already done it before.” These randomly popped into my head as I started to catalog what I use on a regular basis:

1. Google Search (and their revenue model)

2. Adobe Flex

3. iPod (and almost all of Apple’s products)

4. Firefox

5. Southwest Airlines

6. JetBlue

7. Reddit (and News.YC ;-) )

8. Java, Ruby, Python, etc.

9. WordPress

10. Twitter

11. FriendFeed

12. Gmail

13. Skype

14. TextMate and others

15. Facebook

16. Google Reader

17. Mint

18. Mint

19. CouchSurfing

20. You - don’t overlook the unique perspective you can bring to anything you happen to be interested in. If you build stuff that you find useful, there’s likely to be a market for it. 

One final thought.

In the above list, if I had to identify one or two key factors that contributed to the success of these innovations it would be “simplification” and “ease of use.” Something to keep in mind.  

Additional suggestions welcome. I could spend all day doing this and not run out of examples. 

Top Lessons I’ve Learned From Starting My Company (So Far)

Saturday, April 12th, 2008

Because I just launched my company, I spend a lot of time reading / thinking / discussing with others about what it takes to succeed.

Without having been at it very long I am, nevertheless, beginning to build a philosophy that I think will end up guiding me through the coming years. Here’s what I’ve come up with so far.

1. Certain people were just never meant to be employees. Those people have to be more creative in order to survive.

I’m one of them. I’ve worked at various companies for 8 or 9 years now and the one thing I knew when I left my last company was that it was the right thing to strike out on my own. Success or failure, as commonly measured by others, is irrelevant. As long as you’re surviving and you’re not hemorrhaging money, you can continue on your own. And that’s far preferable to living out somebody else’s vision as an employee.

People like us operate in a different economy. Money and stability are nice but there are more important things. And it turns out, you can survive remarkably well while you’re building that world-changing company on less than you were used to making when gainfully employed.

How do we stay sane every time we see people living the good life on either someone’s salary or when picturing life in the shadow of an upcoming recession? We are optimistic that 1) things will work out one way or another and 2) that we’ll know what to do when we get there.

2. I’m really uncomfortable with two common startup doctrines: that free is a viable business model and that the only way to succeed is to get bought or go public.

Since 2006 or so, people have bandied around the idea that we’re in another bubble. We were certainly in a real estate bubble and I just knew, beginning in about 2003, that that particular asset class was not a good bet for my money.

The question is whether the same is true for internet tech today. But I’m not an investor in this case. I’m an entrepreneur. So I’m already in the game. The question is how am I going to stay in the game?

Inevitably, the question of business models comes up. According to people like Paul Graham and others, whom I respect, they say not to worry too much about the business model at first. I can understand that and I try to take their advice. On the other hand, there are lots of people who hear statements like that and interpret it to mean that the current ad-supported model of “free” internet services is an endless pool of money.

I just spent the last two years building technology to help the largest companies in the world optimize where their money is spent on advertising. They may not be there yet but, let me tell you, eventually even large advertisers are going to start looking at the low conversion rates that your free service provides to them and simply pull the plug. Poof. There go thousands of free services when this happens at scale.

So, I’m not saying you have to figure out your business model right away. I certainly don’t have mine completely figured out. And I’m not saying acquisition is bad - I’d love it to happen to a company that I build. What I am saying is that, given the direction things are going, you’ll want to do everything you can to make your business self-sustaining along the way. But only do that if it doesn’t compromise the quality of your product. Embrace constraints, as they say, and deliver a quality product that people want.

3. The phrase “social media” already makes me want to puke.

Until very recently, I was favorably inclined towards social media when it was just hackers talking about it because they actually had the skills and background to execute on their ideas and build new products to connect people in new ways.

But now, the people most using the term are just endless droves of consultants. I’m not saying consulting is a bad business. I engage in it myself to fund my company and there is certainly a need for companies who use technology to pay better attention to their users. But there is something about the term “social media” and a certain group of consultants who really turn me off to the idea. It feels manipulative and gross.

The reason I bring this up in the context of building companies is I’ve figured out that there is always going to be some fad. It usually starts, in this field, with some game-changing technology development. Then, the consultants and media come out of the woodwork and everyone, including more hackers, starts to build companies around it.

Pay attention to your own feelings about these trends. When you start to get sick of it, it means everybody else will get sick of it in a year or so. Geeks are susceptible to hyperbole but they also get bored quicker. My theory is that all boom cycles are completely at the mercy of boredom. You don’t want to build a business based on something that people are going to get bored of. Unless you can get acquired really quickly.

4. You need to focus. And fight the traps associated with focus.

All entrepreneurs have ADD. Maybe not literally, but close enough. So we know we need to focus.

Then, you have to find a way to fight the desire to shrink into an overly obscure niche, mislabeling it “focus.” We do that in order to avoid competition and - even worse - the line you get at parties when you explain what you’re doing: “Isn’t somebody already doing that?” (Yeah, welcome to the history of innovation.) It is possible to be too focused on your obscure niche because it means nobody wants what you’re building. That’s bad.

If you avoid that trap, then you have to think big but execute small. Build the simplest version of your service as quickly as possible.

I’m still just getting started in my business, but I’ve learned this once so far. I launched the current version of Boompaste primarily so I could learn how other sites like PopUrls worked and what the opportunities were for innovation. In the process, I found a product idea that I really liked (and will probably end up being the future of Boompaste because the current version’s sorry ass is about to get shut down). But instead of just going with a simple implementation of that new product idea, I came up with a grand vision of what the next version of Boompaste would be and it took me months to get anywhere. I went through that existential doubt that all entrepreneurs go through where they question the value of everything they do. That part of startups sucks and not many people talk about it. Maybe talking about it does no good.

Anyway, eventually, around January I realized that the next version of Boompaste was going nowhere. I got honest with myself. Within 24 hours, I had the idea for Gridjit. I was able to launch Gridjit within days and it was immediately useful to many people. It’s been relatively successful, given the small amount of marketing I’ve done.

What was the difference? The site did one thing and it was quick to implement. People liked it. As I add new functionality, I’m very careful to keep myself focused. My rule is becoming if you can’t launch the next valuable set of features in 7 days, you’re not focused enough. I’ve scrapped 2 versions and narrowed the scope again as a result. It’s hard, but I’m learning to trust that instinct. And as a result, Gridjit doesn’t have a bunch of shitty features that nobody needs.

5. My best ideas come when not working.

From an evolutionary perspective, staring at a 15″ screen that virtualizes communication with billions of people at the same time is probably one of those things that physical anthropologists will point to 1 million years from now as the turning point in human physiology that enabled us to turn into super-beings that dominate the universe (if we don’t blow ourselves to pieces before then).

But me? I’m stuck with a homo sapiens brain that evolved to its present state a little over 100,000 years ago. This means that I’m hard wired for creativity when I’m not staring at that 15″ screen. I’m sure there’s some name for this mechanism, but I don’t know what it is. Only how it works. It’s why people are most inspired in the shower or when jogging or when hanging out with friends. Very rarely do I have good ideas when I’m working. Work is to execute on those ideas. If you’re running out of ideas or you feel like you’re current ideas need re-validation / invigoration, take a break. Go somewhere. Shut down your machine for a few days.

6. Working at home has made me realize that I miss a lot about life sitting in front of this computer.

Every time I hear my son playing outside while I’m stuck inside working reminds me of two things.

First, don’t think you can defer the good things in your life until some point where you achieve “success” (whatever that means - certainly money doesn’t compare with watching my son play).

Second, it reminds me to actually get out of my chair and go play with him. Or take a walk with my family. Or go on a trip. I started my company because I want freedom. Yes, I work my ass off most of the time. But I don’t want to shut out the most important people in my life for years on end for something that may not achieve my goals for it.

Luck is a part of business too. Don’t think that money or your drive to provide for your family differentiates you in their eyes. Quality time and communication is the only thing that differentiates you.

7. I wasn’t ready to start my company until now. Two things prepared me. And 33 is not too old to found a startup.

It probably sounds funny to people outside of the tech industry to hear someone say that 33 is not too old to start a company. In their minds, of course it’s not too old. 33 is young! But there’s something about this industry’s culture that worships youth.

Whatever.

It really comes down to how well you live below your means. You need to do that in order to survive as an early stage startup. Paul Graham talks about this a lot, but I didn’t steal this from him. I figured it out on my own when I traveled a lot a few years ago.

That’s one of the things that really prepared me for this. In 2005, I quit my job so my wife and I could travel through Asia, New Zealand, the Middle East and Eastern Europe for almost a year. In a way, that was my first startup. I learned exactly how much money I need to survive for a year (and still have a really good time), what I was capable of (quite a lot, as it turns out), and how to adapt to an incredible variety of situations. It was on this trip that I really gained the confidence to start this thing.

The other thing that really prepared me was my work at Covario, the startup I worked for after our trip. I came in at the very beginning and learned that you almost never know how to solve the problems that are going to come up. You just have to trust that you’re smart enough to do the right thing when you get there.

Sometimes you mess up. That’s life. The fact that you messed up at the time / place probably means that someone was watching out for you and let you make that mistake earlier rather than later, when the stakes would be even higher. Be grateful. Move on. Be like a Navy SEAL (except don’t kill people). Adapt. Live off the land. Do whatever it takes to survive and succeed.

That’s my list for now. I’m sure there’s a lot more, but these are the notes I’ve taken so far. I’ll write down more as they come up and I have time.

Yes, We Saw it Coming

Friday, February 1st, 2008

MSFT to buy YHOO.

Social Media Works: Here’s Proof

Thursday, January 10th, 2008

Earlier today, I wrote about my experiences with two online life insurance brokers. I actually had Mack’s post about a woman’s experience with Panera in mind as I wrote it.

Because both of the insurance brokers don’t come off as Web 2.0 type companies, I figured that neither of them would ever see what I wrote, and that was unfortunate. I would always want to know how my customers or prospects felt after they had an encounter with a service that I was offering.

I was pleasantly surprised when Sean Cheyney responded to my comments and explained more about his business and the way it works. Because I have no reason to do otherwise, I take his comments at face value and now the company he works for (AccuQuote) have a much higher standing in my opinion.

It takes a lot of time and energy to track down people who are talking about your company and even more integrity to engage them in conversation. If more companies did this, the concept of “PR Nightmares” would largely go away.

People want to talk to other people. That’s why social media works.

Our exchange can be read here.

The Self-Service Revolution Continues

Wednesday, January 9th, 2008

Every day I see or hear someone talking about the current internet boom and drawing comparisons to the last boom and the inevitable bust. Sure, business is cyclical, but I think the real, comprehensive shift that the internet imposes on business, society, and culture is still in its infancy. I’m not prone to hyperbole or breathless prognostications, and I write this from the perspective of someone who maintains a healthy degree of skepticism.

Here’s an example: I’m reviewing life insurance policies to ensure that we have the proper coverage for my family. I did some research and found two online brokers / aggregators: AccuQuote and Insure.com. I ended up going with Insure.com to connect me with the right policy for two reasons: 1) AccuQuote sent my information (without my permission) to dozens of local agents, who then bombarded me with calls over the next few days and 2) Insure.com has a clean process, better rates, and a clear rating system for their partner’s policies.

One of the local agents that called me did have a better over-the-phone pitch than the others, so I agreed to meet him in person. I’ve done a lot of research on my own and have a decent enough knowledge of the financial landscape (thanks to a variety of self-service tools on the web) to make my own decisions. What amused me was every single decision I have made in regards to my own investment portfolio (types of insurance, indexes vs. stocks / managed funds, etc.) was criticized by this local agent (who is also a “financial planner” and who also has direct incentives to steer me away from things like non-managed index funds. (If you want to read a great book on this subject, I highly recommend The Four Pillars of Investment).

He quoted me a plan that was six times higher than what I found online (and three times higher than what I knew a comparable plan would be elsewhere online) and lost all credibility when he told me “we’ll get control of your assets and move them out of index funds.” And I bet he would.

The point is this: based on my experience, AccuQuote and Insure.com don’t even come close to sexy Web 2.0 applications. There is no social networking application built yet for this space. But I was able to quickly find the information I need and make an informed decision for far less work and, most importantly, I had the confidence that I was only buying what I needed. I wasn’t being sold anything.

This is the difference between “full service” and self-service. You take only what you need, and if you need more you come back to trusted sources. This is what the internet helps to enable and it’s going to take more than the 10-15 years we’ve had so far to complete the revolution of over 500 years of business practices and socialization.

Society Computing

Saturday, December 15th, 2007

TechMeme, of course, is abuzz with discussion about Amazon’s new SimpleDB. Don’t know if this is a huge announcement in its own right, but it definitely demonstrates Amazon’s commitment to taking distribution, its true business objective, to the next logical, though not obvious, step.

On a side note: Business Week has a good write-up of Google 101, the company’s efforts to teach web-scale computing to the next generation of computer scientists. Makes me wish I was still a college student, in Seattle. (Go public schools!)

And finally, a gestalt moment… I’m reading a book by German Theologian Ulrich Duchrow (whom I had the pleasure to meet in San Diego) called Property for People, Not for Profit: Alternatives to the Global Tyranny of Capital. There is this line on page 36 in regards to Hobbe’s analysis of power and society:

“Then Hobbes distinguishes natural power, such as special physical and mental abilities, and instrumental power, i.e. tools such as riches, reputation and good friends, with which one can win more power. From this he concludes ‘that the capacity of every man to get what he wants is opposed by the capacity of every other man’. In the struggle that results, power means finally the ability to command the services of other people.

Thus a power market develops, in which the power of a human being is regarded as a commodity: ‘The value, or worth of a man, is as of all other things, his price: that is to say, so much as would be given for the use of his power: and therefore is not absolute; but a thing dependant on the need and judgement of another’…”

So, I read that and realized: hey, I know that. It’s called cloud computing. And even a little MapReduce is thrown in there. We just did it with humans first. We call it society.

Facebook Ads: First Impressions (No Pun Intended)

Wednesday, November 14th, 2007

The new Facebook Ads network presents some new opportunities for marketers. Whether those opportunities translate into any real value for consumers / Facebook users remains to be seen.

I wanted to understand how it compares to PPC ad networks from the likes of Google, Yahoo, and MSN, so I created a small text ad for Boompaste. It was denied. So I created a new one.

The first, disapproved ad said “Meta is Betta. Get all your news in one place.

I think Facebook rejected it because you have to use the title of your company, product, or service in the ad title and body. Annoying, but whatever. I guess they are shooting for high quality ads, which is good for users.

My second ad reads “Boompaste: Meta is Betta. Get all your news in one place. Boompaste aggregates the most popular stories on the web.

It was approved, for two reasons, I believe:

  1. I targeted 16-40 year olds the first time. This triggers additional editorial review. The second time I targeted 18-40 year olds and it went live almost immediately.
  2. I used the name of the offering in the title, as mentioned above.

So the ad is live, and within 10 minutes I had about 196 impressions and 1 click (CTR of 0.51%). Gotta love PPC.

I’ll post more results later. So far, however, I like the experience. It’s clean and well done, if still immature.

In order for Facebook to really compete, marketers are going to need:

  • Data exports: there is currently no way to export campaign / performance data from Facebook. It would be even better if this was available via API, depending on the delivery options for reports. If you could schedule email delivery of reports, that would be fine.
  • Some sort of transparency. This is a critical area where I believe Facebook is lacking, and it’s tricky because it’s related to privacy. When you buy ads on search or even content networks, you can easily see it live. For example, if you bid high enough on “laptop,” you can query Google, etc. for that keyword and see your ad running in its live environment. You can also view competitors and their ad copy. More sophisticated marketers automate this process.
  • Automated ad placement - Facebook needs to understand that marketers with large budgets work hard to create consistent campaigns across a variety of networks. Nobody wants to manually create thousands of ads on Facebook when you can automate that entire process on Google. Facebook does offer a valuable enough audience to target it as a network regardless, but velocity will suffer in comparison to other networks.

I’ll add more later. You may want to read Fred Wilson’s blog - he is conducting a similar experiment.

Boompaste

Monday, October 1st, 2007

Boompaste is live.

I’ve been inspired by quite a few different takes on RSS and the best way for people to follow the buzz on the web.

Boompaste is designed to make it easy to do so. I’ve got a lot more planned for the site, and it’s barely finished started (with bugs and all) but I wanted to at least get it out there for my friends to see and use. I’m not heavily marketing it right now, because I’d like to see how it grows on its own.

If you think there are ways to make it better / more usable, just let me know.

Etsy: Better than eBay for Direct Online Marketing

Friday, May 25th, 2007

Through a friend, my wife discovered Etsy. I’m sure it’s been around for awhile, but we just found it and we think it’s fantastic.

It lets artists / craftspeople market and sell their products without having to create their own website and figure out how to handle transactions, etc. The look and feel is clean and simple, and it’s a great way to start getting immediate traffic.

The site favors new users / listings so it enourages the prolific.

My wife, Kaoru, has had her own jewerly store online for a long but Etsy makes life so much easier that she is going to switch all of her operations over to Etsy. If you’re an artist, or you know one, there is tremendous potential here.

Etsy: Your place to buy & sell all things handmade
KaoruDesigns.etsy.com

Cycling

Wednesday, May 23rd, 2007

Mike Arrington writes about the ugly place that Silicon Valley has (once again) become now that stupid loads of venture capital have been flooding in for the last two years or so.

Ugliness / greed aside, this particular bubble (if it is one) is interesting. One could look at boom / bust cycles as a matter of exuberance vs. boredom. The last time it all came crashing down, I personally believe, is that people just got bored. Sure, all of the petfood.com stories turned the entire era into a joke but there was, as we must acknowledge, an incredible amount of innovation that occurred. Then all the money went away and the engineers got back to what they do best.

In the following years, innovative services like Flickr, del.icio.us, Wikipedia and, of course, Google were developed. Much of the innovation that we hear about today happened during the downturn years between 2001-2004. If this cycle is indeed nearing an end, I wonder how long it can possibly last. We are just on the cusp of what will be an entirely new generation of technology-driven innovation and services — everything from scalable, interesting virtual reality to major, disruptive (at last) in human-computer interfaces — and it makes me seriously doubt that this next downturn will last long at all.

We are also faced with a set of serious crises - namely, the effects of global climate change and disgusting food / farming practices - in the next 10-20 years. Say what you will, and I certainly have, of that capitalist optimism (some would say delusion) in the face of adversity there is something about crisis that brings out a lot of talent and enthusiasm for making things better.

Finally, back in the internet / tech realm - a lot of the core technologies we rely on today are getting a little long in the tooth. Consider email. Does anyone think that we will be messaging one another using the same tired old protocols and client interfaces 20 years from now? It’s past time for revolutionary thinking about how we do not just email but web servers, operating systems, HCI, and data management.

Here’s to the next downturn.